Learned gender
The transformation of gendered learning characteristics through "technology" beginning in the 1960s

In the quantification and attribution of supposedly gender-specific learning characteristics, "technology" has played a crucial role as a paradigm since the second half of the 20th century. Especially in statistical techniques, cultural and epistemological presuppositions about "gender" and "technology" are contained, which continue to co-determine the external and self-perception of female and male actors in their dealings with technology to the present day.

Social attributions have an enormous influence on the self-image of female and male actors in digitization. In the learning context, external and self-assessments in dealing with technology use and technical-rational understanding are established, which help to determine women's and men's actions and decisions. The meaning of “gender” in the context of learning and technology has been the topic of many social science, pedagogical and psychological research projects since the 1960s (among other things due to the advent of computers), usually initiated by politics or business. The project aims to examine these studies in terms of a secondary analysis of their empirical data collection in order to reflect on the quantifications and attributions of gender-specific experiences of technology. Through various forms of quantification, learning subjects could be increasingly fundamentally measured, viewed as a sum of learning characteristics, and thus classified as parts of a group (male/female). This project will examine how empirical research quantified and (re)produced gendered presuppositions (biases) through format, categorizations, classifications, and content. By analyzing questions that sometimes change and sometimes remain continuous, the project aims to demonstrate the persistent impact of bias that pre-structured respective answers through the formal and semantic logics of the questions. The project aims to investigate how statistical surveys, in interaction with presuppositions about “technology” and “gender,” contributed to the consolidation of gendered subjects of learning and thus provided supposedly objective facts for social and political decision-making processes.

Picture: L. Kurz

Contact

Work S3|12 402
Residenzschloss 1
64283 Darmstadt

Education

06/2014 Abitur

10/2014 – 3/2020 Joint Bachelor of Arts – German Linguistics and Literature and Political Science, Darmstadt Technical University

4/2020 – 4/2023 Master of Arts – Data and Discourse Studies, Darmstadt Technical University

Since 09/2023 PhD candidate and research assistant in the Emmy Noether research group “KoLT" at the Department of History of Technology at Darmstadt Technical University

Working experience

08/2016 – 11/2017 Freelance teacher for German as a foreign language, Frankfurt a.M.

12/2017 – 01/2020 Student assistant, Hochschulrechenzentrum – IT department, training and education team, Technical University of Darmstadt

06/2019 – 10/2020 Student assistant, Institute of Linguistics and Literature (LingLit) – digital literary science, Prof. Dr. Evelyn Gius, Technical University of Darmstadt

11/2020 – 03/2022 Student assistant Zentrale Studienberatung (currently: Science Communication Center), editorial podcast staff, Technical University of Darmstadt

Dissertation project

Technology bears meaning and ideologies and is constructed through social and material means. While digital technologies have been accessible for some, others have been excluded from participating in the “digital revolution” or were chased out of the disciplines, specifically women. In connection to technology, there are certain connotations, cultural biases and clichés surrounding user groups and their affinity to the matter as well as how said user groups are treated in education, training and the workforce. Intersectionally connected dimensions of gender, class, habitus, “race", ethnicity, education background and the material surroundings of a subject determine the subject’s handling and experience with technology and technological education. Technology and gender are situated in a co-constructionist relationship and are mutually dependent concepts. Both digital technologies and gendered technologies are learned.

In my dissertation, I am concerned with the (co-) construction of gendered learning subjects (as in individuals) from 1950 to 2000. My main interest is the discursive relation of gender and technology regarding education and work since the postwar period in the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic as well as reunified Germany. My dissertation aims to work out the epistemological foundations that influenced learning subjects in Germany regarding their gender and technological knowledgeability.

Research interests

  • History of Technology
  • Gender, (en-)gendering practices
  • Human-machine relationship
  • Learning theories
  • Technical design and usability

Publications

Liggieri, K. & Kurz, L. (2025). The Gendered Language of Technology. Technology and Language, 6(3), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2025.03.02

Presentations

Blank Spaces in the History of Gender-Technological Education: A Historical-Epistemological Examination of the Federal Republic of Germany from the Post-war Years to the 1990s. – Herausforderungen der Technik. Transatlantischer Workshop zur Geschichte der Mensch-Maschine-Beziehung im 20. Jahrhundert, 25.05.2024 (https://www.hsozkult.de/event/id/event-143842.

Geschlechteressentialismus im Technikbildungsdiskurs der BRD in den 1970er und 80er Jahren. – Studientag an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 13.03.2025

The Essentialization of gender regarding technology in the West German education discourse in the 1970s and 1980s. – European Social Science History Conference, 26.–29.03.2026, Leiden, Niederlande